Having multiple claim issues for whitelisted addresses stating they have already claimed their tokens or have no tokens to claim - when both scenarios aren’t true. To test this, I updated my wallet to be able to claim 10 and I can only claim 1. The claim page is here: https://app.manifold.xyz/c/BORN-TO-MEME
I am also having issues uploading an mp4 file for a new mint. Screenshot attached below.
Contract address for both: 0x2DA827a0C6417Ee74253937F8565FE3DaD5Fb975
I am having similar issues with my claim page. User’s on the allowlist are suddenly not able to claim because it says they already claimed (even though they did not), or the values are not matching up with the CSV (i put 7 but they can only claim 6). I have an ERC-1155 token claim page. I’m getting support tickets left and right about this, any fix for this?
Thanks for the bump $ignore woo. I’m sure we’ll have an answer here soon.
I’m also going to ‘flip’ my erc1155 from free claim to having a reduced sale price for specific token holders - gated by csv ofc. Need to know it works before opening that can of worms!
The free claim is for 86 wallets. The sale price is for 312
Hi guys, we are actively looking into this issue currently. In the mean time please do not update your claim with a different allowlist. Updaing claim with a different allowlist does not produce expected results currently
Will do. The claim is closed and i’m going to flip it to public free claim, 1 per wallet - gotta lift these vibes! But would still like to be able to claim my allotment at a later date for giveaways.
Hi all, wanted to see if there was a definite fix for this? Running into similar problems with
Adding 4 white listed addresses originally. Those can still mint 1 token each.
Deleted the CSV and re-uploaded with rows appended (5 new, 9 total) and the int page still works for those originally added, does not work for the new addresses.
We were considering doing a partial drop this weekend with the full drop for all participants Jan 1st. This seems to be a little spotty in terms of supported execution tho?