I get this error when I type all the fields you told meā¦
hex data is odd-length (argument=āvalueā, value=ā0x0ā, code=INVALID_ARGUMENT, version=bytes/5.1.0)
hex data is odd-length (argument=āvalueā, value=ā0x0ā, code=INVALID_ARGUMENT, version=bytes/5.1.0)
Sorry, merkleroot is
0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
Yes. Hey. You put in āidenticalā true. It needs to be false. Also the location was wrong. You can do an easier update. Visit:
https://etherscan.io/address/0xa46f952645d4deec07a7cd98d1ec9ec888d4b61e#writeContract
storageProtocol (we are changing this to ipfs)
3
identical
false
location (your new ipfs location path)
ipfs/Qmcotx5j9b4N1LKPakZ7dejgRTptSyfRkBiXxKyhzDQxmm
Make sure your location is as above, with NO slash at the beginning or end. And make sure identical is false
ITS WORKING, THANK YOU SO MUCH!
Appreciate your time and help <3
Hi everyone, I redid exactly the same steps and it didnāt work for me, I think this manual image change tutorial was confusing, could you explain it in just one post more clearly please? Thanks all.
Please share all the addresses and parameters you are trying to update using.
Contract: https://etherscan.io/address/0xbc2447c437a9882c73d3178fa3945744693705af
Collection: https://opensea.io/collection/criminalsnft
Freemint page: Criminals New Home
Mint page: Criminals
This ID is from the mint page.
https://apps.api.manifoldxyz.dev/public/instance/data?id=1072285936
Contract where Iām trying to put the information that was said in this tutorial that Iām not getting.
https://etherscan.io/address/0xa46f952645d4deec07a7cd98d1ec9ec888d4b61e#writeContract
Click āConnect to Web3ā, make sure it turns green. You may have to click it twice.
Go to method 5: updateClaim
For the parameters, enter:
paymentReceiver
0xbD5224f9509C0f4CFcC99296dd72196661Fa8D40
After filling in all these fields, as soon as I click on the metamask, I get an error.
Remembering that I donāt know if Iām doing it right, Iām not a programmer, so Iām just trying to understand where all this information comes from so I can change it and do mine correctly.
Thanks.
A few reasons.
Link is different because you are using a different version of the claim app.
I tried, it didnāt work.
I got the free mint page ID and also the public mint page ID, both gave an error in the metamask
MINT: Criminals
https://apps.api.manifoldxyz.dev/public/instance/data?id=1072285936
FREE MINT HOLDERS: Criminals New Home
https://apps.api.manifoldxyz.dev/public/instance/data?id=1042186480
That error says you rejected the metamask transaction. Are you seeing an error on metamask? Are you sure youāre connected as the contract owner when issuing the command? What you entered appears correct if you are entering it here:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x7581871e1C11f85ec7F02382632B8574FAd11B22#writeContract
This looks like it should work as expected.
Please share a full screenshot which includes the url you are on and the conencted wallet so I can help you verify.
In this second link it worked, I changed the page of FREE MINT and MINT.
I made a free mint and a paid mint, and the same image remained as if it were ID 1 for both mints, the IDs could be different, I didnāt understand anything that happened.
The other 2 NFTs that were already there, not updated, still have the wrong BaseURL.
What a mess, it was simply changing the IPFS for the contract to read in the order of the IDs.
https://opensea.io/collection/criminalsnft
MINT: Criminals
https://apps.api.manifoldxyz.dev/public/instance/data?id=1072285936
FREE MINT: Criminals New Home
https://apps.api.manifoldxyz.dev/public/instance/data?id=1042186480
Where do I need to trade only once to effectively trade across the entire collection? and that you keep the order of the IDs and that each ID appears with your image, thank you.
as you can see IDs 1 and 2 still have the old images.
IDs 2 and 3 have the correct IPFS but showing the same ID
Ok, the reason token 3 and 4 show the same image is because you had two separate claims.
Token 3 was minted via:
And token 4 was minted via:
You have to create separate IPFS metadata for each mint for them to all be unique, and each metadata set needs to be numbered starting at 1.
Each claim page has itās own unique metadata numbering starting at zero.
Given what youāre describing, if you want all tokens to be unique across both claims, YOU NEED TWO IPFS FOLDERS.
So, if you want to have a set of unique metadata for:
free-mint-holders, you need an IPFS folder with files 1-N and perform the following transaction:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x7581871e1c11f85ec7f02382632b8574fad11b22#writeContract
updateTokenURIParams
creatorContractAddress
- 0xbc2447c437a9882c73d3178fa3945744693705af
claimIndex
- 1042186480
storageProtocol
- 3
identitcal
- false
location
- <YOUR IPFS LOCATION, likely in the form ipfs/<HASH>
This will cause all tokens minted on that claim to be assigned metadata:
ipfs:///1ā¦n
criminals, you need an IPFS folder with files 1-1000 (seems like it is 1000 max supply) and perform the following transaction:
https://etherscan.io/address/0x7581871e1c11f85ec7f02382632b8574fad11b22#writeContract
updateTokenURIParams
creatorContractAddress
- 0xbc2447c437a9882c73d3178fa3945744693705af
claimIndex
- 1072285936
storageProtocol
- 3
identitcal
- false
location
- <YOUR OTHER IPFS LOCATION, likely in the form ipfs/<HASH>
This will cause all tokens minted on that claim to be assigned metadata:
ipfs:///1ā¦n
Given what it seems like youāre trying to do (I can only guess), my recommendation is to let the mint complete first, randomly assign your NFTās between the two claims, create the two IPFS folders based on that assignment (both need to have files starting as 1 and have non-overlapping metadata) then update both claim pages.
Again, metadata ordering is PER CLAIM PAGE, not globally.
Thanks, now it all makes sense.
Greetings. I am trying the same exact steps that have been mentioned above. I grabbed the address from the extension of my claim page. Once I was in the ā12. updateClaimā, everything that was mentioned lined up. The only thing though is the final step that shows on mine is that the system is asking for an erc20 address? I am confused on if I am using the wrong address to be adjusting for said ipfs update, or if the erc20 address is posted somewhere in the contract and I am missing that entirely.